Alchemy, Spagyrics, Spagytonics. The need for a systematic clarification.

We are witnessing in recent times, an increasing confusion and a systematic monopolism of words such as 'alchemy ' and 'spagyrics'. This act of usurpation and intellectual dishonesty is much more extensive than it might seem, but we will refer here to what happens in the last 28 years only, with particular reference to a small group of individuals, also disorganized and poorly trained, derived from David Hudson's ormusian school.

As we had already occasion to explain elsewhere, we certainly consider the work of Mr. Hudson, who has placed an interesting starting point on which we would have expected at least an intellectually honest opening to conceptual development and evolution by his followers. However, by him too there was a deep manipulation of the truth.  

It is not our purpose in this discussion detailing the motivations of our proven reserves against the authenticity of the American farmer's researches, but we'll just point out that Hudson fabricated the whole thing out of his imagination, even manipulating some critical papers of the initial Bluebird mining project. There is some evidence that a lot of material written by John Sicafoose PhD, chief of that project, has been decontextualized, re-handled and reassembled by Hudson for his own use and consumption in favors of the ORMEs fairy tale. We possess a copy of the original papers and then the staunchest defenders of the ormus school more generally have very little to oppose. 

Much less, we do not accept as true certain statements of his partnership with General Electric, as he stated at a conference held in 2011 at Enota. Nonsense, considering that we know personally some important names of this multinational company, who have openly denied any relationship with him: past, present and future.

On the other side, it seems that the followers of David Hudson are locked inside a shell of preconceptions, a sort of religious monopoly of the world ORMEs/ORMUS - but also of everything that is related to the monatomic state of matter -  in which every form of evolution (and discussion out of their religion principles) is suppressed. 

The contradiction arises also from a small group inside the same ormusian community, and represented by no more than 6-7 individuals, particularly violent in their attacks against any unpopular voice.  

In fact some of them are beginning to doubt about the monoatomic nature of this matter, and even they tend to question the nature of the diatomic state. Do you know why? It is simple: it is just because someone has tried to make them understand by scientific evidences how things really are! 

When these explanations came out, the first reaction was that they first attacked the authors and now they pull the oars in the boat, concluding that the m-state elements are no longer monatomic, either diatomic but "something about which we know very little." 

Not only that. According them (and I'll spare you the names in order not to incur in their  continuing and puerile attacks) even Hudson and Lawrence Gardner are to be considered as unreliable authors, because the only ones who support and affirm that this matter is monatomic. That strange! yet until before someone (myself) expose scientific reasons about the impossibility of the existence of monatomic matter outside particle accelerators, everyone (and I mean REALLY everyone) of these "confederate gurus" of "modern" North American alchemy  argued the opposite. Indeed they attacked heavily us, insulting our work, our staff, our business partners.

Of course, keep the people in ignorance and confusion is typical of all sects. It was yesterday, it's today and it'll be always.

But leaving aside this bunch of pirates, and just for clarity, let back to topics more edifying.  

Chemists define as monatomic or monoatomic those elements "that are stable as single atoms. Mon- or Mono- means one. In order for an element to be stable by itself, it needs to have a stable octet of valence electrons". (A. M. Helmenstine, Ph.D.) 

We unearthed this definition, because those who support the ormusian school pf thought, consider this matter as simple minerals, true elemental and chemically obtainable bodies through simple acid-base reactions, but with so strange acquired properties in reason of the mere presence of the alchemist energy. A real nonsense, as a simple chemical reactions always returns a molecular state (that it is solid or liquid), or even colloidal suspensions of diatomic or polyatomic clusters. Unlike the case in which these gentlemen have an atomic force microscope and can in this case assembling matter one atom at a time. But even in that case, they should face the fact that, once the atoms are placed close to each other, they will bind irreversibly.

As the reader can see, it creates a giant mess on the basic terms and principles.

The real monatomic matter is something very different, obtainable only through cyclotrons, and stabilizable in a suitable means only with systems similar to those used in the production of radiolabeled tracers for medical purposes. So a technology totally different and much more complex - both in the principles and in the methods - than the application of four beakers, a portable Ph meter, a bit of sea water and a bottle of food grade lye. Same applies to other methods that use sodium metal or other gadgets as steel pots and cooking stoves.

But again, we do not discuss certain issues related the true monatomic state of matter and the unique way to obtain it in stable form. We already expressed our thoughts elsewhere. The purpose of this article is to systematically reposition the areas and subjects, which are often confused and mixed together so indecent, ignorant and nothing short of vulgar. We will make a distinction absolutely necessary for people to be correctly informed.

Two terms are often usurped to describe the background disciplines that underlies all the experiments conducted by the GOC: Alchemy and Spagyrics.

Along with these two terms, a series of fraudulent misrepresentation, historical falsifications, confusion and nonsense statements, worthy of the most uninformed tabloid.

In reality, the really ancient and serious disciplines in question are describable in the following way:  

1. Alchemy: Theoretical/Practical Art, precisely positioned historically and geographically, whose main purpose is the embodiment of the Universal Spirit (universal fluid) in a suitable Magnet made of non-specified matter, in order to coagulate and settle it in a tangible and manipulable form. Such a "coagulum" will return - by a series of precise operations called "philosophical" - the so called Philosophical Mercury, the unequivocal basis of so-called Philosopher's Stone, which will be oriented to the three Kingdoms: mineral, animal, vegetable.

Alchemy therefore is a science for the study and understanding of the three Kingdoms of Nature and at the same time a philosophical discipline, in which theory and practice are tightly connected and reciprocally delivered in a series of precise tasks kept secret, whose complexity transcends any other known methodology of modern chemistry and physics.
Alchemy is a Science in the initiatory sense of term, which can be gnoseologically and  epistemologically communicated only through two channels:

1. the written channel, that is the Word that is preserved physically in and all along History through a coded language and theoretical method (Theoria) whose key can not be public released.
2. the oral channel, such as the transmission of the Practical Teaching (Praxis) from mouth to ear by an Adept to a Philosopher, or to a subject who has implemented the fundamental option of conscious passage from the position of simple Postulant to that of operative Philosopher.

Alchemy is the wisdom that comes from the awareness of the complexity of natural dictation, a Discipline that is primarily operating practice within a physical microcosm, in order to replicate and further improve the universal macrocosm.
The bodies obtained in Alchemy, and then in order to real philosophical operations are absolutely new bodies that have nothing to do with the matters used at the start and that manifest both chemically and physically a real and inherently deep transmutation of matter, at the atomic and quantum identity levels.

Whatever school or method (especially modern) that transcend these fundamental assumptions and that is unable to obtain the true Philosophical Matter, can not be named or even considered as Alchemy. Today there are many schools of self-proclaimed alchemists, more or less dispersed throughout the world, but only with the achievement of the True Spirit of Philosophical Wine (which has nothing to do with ethanol or with any other ordinary chemical compound), whose structure is unique and absolute and not rise to subjective interpretation, we can really talk about Alchemy and Adeptness. 

Differently, we have only metallurgy involving common chemistry reactions.

2. Spagyrics: Spagyrics also called Chymistry (Chymia) is a practical Science recovered and redefined by Paracelsus (Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, 1493 – 1541), gnoseologically similar but epistemologically different than Alchemy, the origin of which is more recent and historically/geographically situated. 

Spagyrics aims at obtaining new bodies through a process of disintegration and reconstruction of organized and specified bodies, as they are offered by the Three Kingdoms of Nature: mineral, animal and vegetable.

The process of disintegration of organized matter is done through various methods, depending on the kingdom of the origin of the raw material used and the result you want to achieve.
The difference with Alchemy consists properly in:

1. Spagyrics relies on various Mentrua, properly conceived according to the Art (as for mineral Kingdom), or usually on biological putrefaction and fermentation, as well as distillation processes (as for vegetable and animal Kingdom).
2. Alchemy relies directly on the Universal Agent only, a compound that only Adepts know how to obtain and stabilize permanently, which acts catalytically without ever exhausting its properties.

According to the classification by Nicolas LeFèbvre (Nicolas Lefèvre et Arthur Du Monstier, Cours de Chymie, pour servir d'introduction the cette science, vol. 1, Leloup, Paris 1751) - which we return in the redefined and synthetic form for the best understanding by the reader -  Spagyrics can be divided into: 

• Medicinal Chymistry - or the practice intended for the preparation of remedies for the healing of intelligent beings, plants and animals.
• Philosophical Chymistry - or the practice intended to deeply study and reproduce the manifested chymical mechanisms of Nature.

Spagyrics has several application schools in respect of the method in the remedies preparation. Today we can count at least a dozen, of which only ten are officially recognized. These are all stemming from the single root or classical or Paracelsian Spagyrics, perfected and enriched later by N. LeFebvre and Antonio de Sgobbis from Montagnana.  

Today, Spagyrics has been deeply standardized, after the systematization by Carl Friederich Zimpel (1801-1879) and even in its various modern methodological differentiations, some of these methods has been recognized and included in the Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of Germany (HAB) and European Pharmacopoeia (Eur. Ph.).

Alchemy and Spagyrics may have common elements and cross-connections, but keep clear in mind that these are two independent doctrines, whose purpose is very different. 

Everything out of these basic principles is pure Hyperchemistry or metallurgy.

3. Spagytonics: Also defined as holospagyrics and holotonic chemistry, is a modern discipline, founded by A. R. Jenner, H. Fischer, A. Zimmerman (the Group of Zurich), that tends to unify alchemy, spagyrics, quantum chemistry, quantum physics and condensed state physics, neurosciences while preserving their identity as epistemologically and gnoseologically independent.

Spagytomics arises from the need to systematize a delicate and complex topic, that of a peculiar form of exotic matter obtained through the conciliation between spagyric methodologies with the use of cyclotrons and modified radiolabeling technologies.

The studies conducted for years on nuclear superdeformation by the Group of Zurich headed by A. Jenner, allow to isolate a new form of superdeformed nuclear matter, from metallic gold spagyrically modified under certain conditions, leading to the creation of a new class of stable matter assimilable by the body, with a particular action on the neurosignaling and the quantum structure rebalancing of the living being.

Superdeformed Nuclear Hybrids (SNH) are created for the first time in the lab and immediately they exhibit superconducting behavior, with a higher performance as a self-adaptive identity. This matter's hybridization compose the Holotonic Matter, the building blocks of philosophical subtle matter intended in the ancient alchemical Cosmology, that is represented by a new category of non-local particles that the Zurich group identify as:

1. Quantons: the SNH identity, ie the particles physically ponderable, measurable and observable, obviously with a dedicated technology and specific detection systems.
2. Esotons: a class of quasi-particles with high energy gradient, which represent the vibrational component, the propagating emanation of holotonic matter.

Spagytomics should in no way be construed as Alchemy, nor as Spagyrics even like as mainstream Science, but as a new model of approach that - as mentioned above - tends to the unification of the fields. The Group of Zurich is developing on an experimental basis a standard of measurement for this new exotic matter, which will be available in scientific publications as the 100% level of experiment replication will be achieved and confirmed. The scientific method, totally free of preconceptions is what the Group of Zurich want to apply as an element of absolute validation and scientific honesty.

Conclusion: This clarification was necessary in order to specify that the current ormusian  school does not represent anything in the three disciplines stated in the points 1, 2 and 3, but a current non-verified and absolutely fanciful school of thought that produces precipitates of magnesium and calcium hydroxide, containing some elements in metallic form which can not be considered alchemical preparations, nor mono-atomic identities, but only a bunch of minerals as polyatomic molecules, already present in the starting raw matter.

There isn't anything alchemical, philosophical, spagyrical and/or spagytonic in these preparations, despite the daring claims by the representatives of this school of thought, who  have so much to criticize the work of others.
 
Moreover, if the same work of David Hudson is questionable because its patents do not report anything that is not common chemistry and its resulting claims are in fact not even patentable, the methods exposed by the today ormusian school are even more simple approximate precipitation of inorganic salts.  

This partially explain the reasons because the method of Hudson and followers for the isolation of so-called "ORMEs" was never recognized by the USPTO, that refused always to grant any patent right, and the fact he had to apply for a UK and Australian patent, countries where regulations in this matter are more flexible. If the monatomic state of matter exists, it is not according what is described by the ormusian school.  

Just as an example, though not sufficient and in need of further study, a look to the following documents is necessary at least for understand something about certain physical behaviors of monatomic gold:

Stiff monatomic gold wires with a spinning zigzag geometry by Daniel Sanchez-Portal, Emilio Artacho, Javier Junquera, Pablo Ordejon, Alberto Garcia, Jose M. Soler

The Puzzling Stability of Monatomic Gold Wires by J. A. Torres, E. Tosatti, A. Dal Corso, F. Ercolessi, J. J. Kohanoff, F. D. Di Tolla, J. M. Soler

Obviously, because of our words, we will be heavily attacked by the ormusian school and its representative flagships but the science is science and history is history.